PEAR Team Leaks 1.8 TB of Exchange Group Databases
The emerging PEAR Team has leaked 1.8 TB of highly sensitive corporate and client records from Canada-based Exchange Group. Our detailed technical analysis exposes their data-only extortion tactics, RMM persistence methods, and actionable security telemetry to protect enterprise environments.

Key Takeaways
- The PEAR Team allegedly exfiltrated and leaked 1.8 TB of highly sensitive corporate databases, QuickBooks/Sage financial files, and HR records belonging to Exchange Group.
- The group targets compromised remote access credentials, utilizing long dwell times to thoroughly map target networks and isolate valuable database repositories.
- Rather than encrypting targets, PEAR utilizes an exfiltration-only extortion model, exploiting legitimate RMM utilities like AteraAgent and Splashtop to maintain persistence undetected.
Compromised virtual private network (VPN) and remote desktop protocol (RDP) gateways represent the primary initial access vector exploited by the PEAR (Pure Extraction and Ransom) Team in their campaign against the Exchange Group (exg.ca). On May 20, 2026, this emerging cyber-extortion syndicate publicly announced the exfiltration of approximately 1.8 terabytes (TB) of highly sensitive corporate, financial, and client records from the Canadian accounting and professional services firm. The compromised dataset, which was subsequent compiled and publicized on darkforums.su, contains sensitive financial ledger files, Sage and QuickBooks database backups, human resources (HR) folders, personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), and extensive email archives.

PEAR Team Attack Metrics
Unlike traditional ransomware operators that rely on cryptographic lockouts, the PEAR Team utilizes an exfiltration-only extortion framework. This workflow focuses on silent exfiltration and high-leverage data exposure, bypassing signature-based ransomware detection. To counter these stealth campaigns, enterprise defenders must understand the specific administrative abuse patterns and exfiltration pathways that define modern data-broker groups.
Threat Actor Profile: PEAR Team
- Origin
- Unknown
- Motivation
- Financial Extortion (Exfiltration-only)
- Targets
- Financial ServicesAccounting & ConsultingProfessional ServicesHealthcare
- TTPs
- Compromised VPN/RDP AccessLegitimate RMM Abuse (Atera, Splashtop)Living off the Land (PowerShell, PsExec)Data-only extortion (no encryption)Staging via RClone/WinSCP
Technical Breakdown of the PEAR Team Attack Chain
The PEAR Team demonstrates high operational discipline, exhibiting an average network dwell time between 22 and 41 days. This extended dwell period allows the threat actors to map the internal network infrastructure, harvest high-privilege credentials, and locate the highest-value data repositories before triggering any security alerts.
PEAR Team Intrusion and Extortion Lifecycle
- 1Initial Access
Valid VPN/RDP Credentials
- 2Persistence
Malicious RMM (Atera/Splashtop)
- 3Discovery
Target Sage/QuickBooks
- 4Exfiltration
Renamed RClone/WinSCP
- 5Extortion
Tor Leak Site Staging
Step 1: Initial Access and Dwell Time
Initial compromise is achieved predominantly through credential abuse. PEAR Team operators systematically harvest or purchase valid VPN and RDP credentials. These credentials are acquired from public breaches, credential stuffing lists, or active infostealer logs distributed on the dark web. Secondary access pathways include targeted spear-phishing campaigns designed to execute loaders that bypass standard perimeter controls.
Step 2: Living off the Land and RMM Abuse
To avoid triggering endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms, the attackers minimize the use of custom compiled malware. Instead, they rely on Living off the Land (LotL) techniques, running administrative utilities already present on the host system. They use PowerShell and PsExec for local execution and lateral movement across the internal domain.
Persistence is maintained through the unauthorized installation of legitimate, commercial Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) software. Specifically, PEAR installs AteraAgent and Splashtop Remote Service. Because IT administrators widely use these applications, security operation centers often whitelist them, allowing PEAR to establish persistent, redundant command and control (C2) channels without generating security incidents.
Step 3: Targeted Discovery and Data Collection
Once persistence is secured, PEAR conducts targeted internal reconnaissance. The threat actors systematically query active directory domains to locate file servers, domain controllers, and cloud-synced backups. They run local script searches for specific file types and keywords, focusing on database platforms like Sage and QuickBooks, which contain core corporate ledger and transaction details. Data is then staged in hidden directories and compressed using standard utility binaries like 7-Zip or WinRAR.
Step 4: Stealthy Exfiltration via Renamed Binaries
The compressed files are transferred off-network using robust command-line tools like RClone or WinSCP. To evade network traffic monitoring and command-line detection rules, PEAR regularly renames these utility binaries to mimic legitimate Windows system processes. The files are streamed to external hosting servers managed by the threat actors via encrypted protocols, making deep packet inspection difficult without active TLS decryption.
Enterprise Security and Compliance Risks
The leak of 1.8 TB of financial and operational databases poses severe security and regulatory risks. When accounting database structures like Sage and QuickBooks are exposed, malicious actors gain access to client transaction histories, vendor bank details, tax documents, and business-critical operational structures. This data provides downstream attackers with the exact intelligence required to execute convincing vendor-impersonation and business email compromise (BEC) campaigns.
Furthermore, because the compromise includes PII, PHI, and sensitive corporate records, affected entities face severe regulatory scrutiny. Organizations operating internationally or processing data across jurisdictions must maintain rigorous visibility over their digital assets. In the GCC region, strict regulatory frameworks require enterprises to implement proactive threat hunting and continuous visibility over their internet-facing assets.
To evaluate if your outward-facing configurations are vulnerable, utilizing Attack Surface Management can help discover exposed remote access portals, out-of-date VPN gateways, and unpatched assets before threat groups discover them.
Observed MITRE ATT&CK Techniques
Advanced Detection Logic for Security Operations
To detect the presence of PEAR Team actors or similar data-only extortion groups, security teams must deploy behavioral detection rules that focus on administrative tool abuse and anomalous data egress patterns.
Splunk SPL: Detecting Potential RClone Data Exfiltration
This Splunk search identifies the execution of RClone or renamed command-line copy utilities by analyzing execution arguments often associated with data staging and remote synchronization:
index=windows EventCode=4688
| search CommandLine="*rclone copy*"
OR CommandLine="*rclone sync*"
OR CommandLine="*--config*"
OR (Image!="*rclone.exe" AND CommandLine="*copy* --config*")
| table _time, host, AccountName, Image, CommandLineMicrosoft Sentinel KQL: Detecting Legitimate RMM Tool Abuse
This query detects unauthorized or anomalous executions of AteraAgent or Splashtop outside of their standard installation paths, signaling potential actor persistence:
DeviceProcessEvents
| where ProcessCommandLine has_any ("AteraAgent", "Splashtop", "AteraAgent.exe")
or FileName has_any ("AteraAgent.exe", "Splashtop")
| where not(FolderPath startswith @"C:\Program Files\Atera Networks\")
| project Timestamp, DeviceName, InitiatingProcessAccountName, FileName, FolderPath, ProcessCommandLinePEAR Team Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)
- emailExtortion Contact Email
- domainpeargxn3oki34c4savcbcfqofjjwjnnyrlrbszfv6ujlx36mhrh57did.onionTor Leak Sitedomainpeargxn3oki34c4savcbcfqofjjwjnnyrlrbszfv6ujlx36mhrh57did.onionTor Leak Site
- domainpearsmob5sn44ismokiusuld34pnfwi6ctgin3qbvonpoob4lh3rmtqd.onionTor Leak Sitedomainpearsmob5sn44ismokiusuld34pnfwi6ctgin3qbvonpoob4lh3rmtqd.onionTor Leak Site
- domaindiyr2bnty7iktyxfd4kz65uigcfappjvux73dpgkkeocp3fmlgnuzyyd.onionTor Leak Sitedomaindiyr2bnty7iktyxfd4kz65uigcfappjvux73dpgkkeocp3fmlgnuzyyd.onionTor Leak Site
- hash457BB4E5DF0E650509322CA894758D925A568828090A3449D5AEEED30E9B8E18DDDFF71909EDTox IDhash457BB4E5DF0E650509322CA894758D925A568828090A3449D5AEEED30E9B8E18DDDFF71909EDTox ID
- cveCVE-2024-40766Often leveraged historically by access brokers (SonicWall)cveCVE-2024-40766Often leveraged historically by access brokers (SonicWall)
Containment and Immediate Mitigation Protocols
If you suspect an active intrusion or credential compromise, execute the following containment measures immediately:
Revoke and Reset Credentials: Force an immediate, system-wide password reset for all Active Directory, VPN, and RDP accounts. Terminate all active sessions across SaaS and internal environments.
Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication: Mandate robust MFA, preferably phishing-resistant methods, on all external connections and internal administrative consoles.
Audit RMM Solutions: Inventory all endpoints for unapproved instances of Atera, Splashtop, AnyDesk, or other remote access utilities. Block any agents that are not authorized by internal IT management.
Isolate Affected Hosts: Use EDR network isolation controls to quarantine suspicious servers or workstations to halt lateral movement and ongoing data transfer.
Implement Immutable Backups: Ensure that backup infrastructure is isolated from the primary network and is stored in an immutable, write-once, read-many configuration.
Organizations must realize that the first indicator of a breach is often the appearance of corporate credentials on underground networks. To systematically assess your external exposures, implementing continuous monitoring is critical.
Free exposure check
Dark Web Scanner
check dark web mentions, compromised account indicators, malware log signals, public breach exposure, and recent underground market activity for your domain.
For long-term protection, deploying comprehensive Dark Web Monitoring ensures that your security teams receive immediate notifications whenever enterprise credentials or internal datasets are identified on underground forums, Tor sites, or hacker chat channels.
Immediate Mitigation Actions
- Revoke and Reset Active Directory, VPN, and RDP CredentialsForce system-wide password reset and terminate all active sessions.
- Enforce Multi-Factor AuthenticationPrioritize phishing-resistant methods on all external & admin interfaces.
- Audit RMM SolutionsIdentify and block unapproved instances of Atera, Splashtop, AnyDesk.
- Isolate Affected HostsQuarantine suspicious servers/workstations using EDR network isolation.
- Validate and Secure Immutable BackupsEnsure backup systems are network-isolated and in WORM configuration.
How to Defend Against Similar Threats
- Audit all endpoints for unauthorized RMM installations, specifically AteraAgent, Splashtop, and AnyDesk.
- Implement strict multi-factor authentication (MFA) requirements across all active VPN, RDP, and cloud services.
- Deploy behavioral detection logic to identify anomalies in file compilation, staging, and data exfiltration utilizing command-line sync utilities.
Threat Intel FAQ
What is the PEAR Team and how do they operate?
How did the PEAR Team gain access to Exchange Group?
Why do threat groups abuse legitimate Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) tools?
Could a similar threat affect your organization?
If your team may be exposed to a similar threat, FemtoSec can help validate blast radius, prioritize remediation, and connect the issue to a practical security program.
Related Threats

October 16, 2026
Returnero Leaks 200,000 Government Records
A dark web forum breach exposing 200,000 citizen records has highlighted severe identity theft and social engineering risks across public administration databases. FemtoSec provides deep technical analysis of the exfiltration vectors, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and actionable containment measures for security teams.

October 14, 2026
Fintech Payment Gateway Leaks 100,000 Billing Records
A threat actor claims to have published approximately 100,000 billing, payment, and customer records from a prominent Cambodian payment gateway on an underground forum, highlighting significant operational and fraud risks for integrated merchants and consumers.

September 20, 2026
Water Infrastructure Authority Database Leaked Online
A threat actor claims to have leaked more than 100,000 records from a public water management entity, exposing Peruvian national identity document numbers, citizen names, emails, and internal complaint registries.